<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Thoughts on Search Flagging</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tentacolor.com/2008/05/03/thoughts-on-search-flagging/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tentacolor.com/2008/05/03/thoughts-on-search-flagging/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 22:29:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: [RESOLVED] Codename Pitchfork &#171; Rheta’s World</title>
		<link>http://tentacolor.com/2008/05/03/thoughts-on-search-flagging/comment-page-1/#comment-1033</link>
		<dc:creator>[RESOLVED] Codename Pitchfork &#171; Rheta’s World</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 17:12:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tentacolor.com/?p=284#comment-1033</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] all that is needed. The proposed new rating system for search items, as published by Massively and commented upon by Jacek Antonelli, (a dream come true to anybody wishing for an efficient way to mob SL entrepreneurs — protection [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

